CSPaper: peer review sidekick

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

R

Pre-prints without peer review: The new gatekeeping era at arXiv and what it means for CS research
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken arxiv review ssrn pre-prints policy survey position workshop google scholar overflow
1

1

0 Votes

1 Posts

67 Views

No one has replied
L

For AI, by AI: A New Scientific Paradigm
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken llm peer review ai assisted peer reviewer publicatin model arxiv ai readers
1

0 Votes

1 Posts

203 Views

No one has replied
R

Everyone Is First Author?! 📚 The Author Order Revolution You Didn't Know You Needed
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Everything about Academic Publishing journal author names name stacking publishing paper first author arxiv alphabetism bias
1

2

0 Votes

1 Posts

672 Views

No one has replied
S

ORCID, Peer Review, and the Metadata Crisis in Computer Science Research
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Everything about Academic Publishing orcid nature scholar computer science profile reviewer matching dblp arxiv openreview
1

1

0 Votes

1 Posts

223 Views

No one has replied
R

🚨 AI vs. arXiv: The Peer Review Battlefield Just Got Automated
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken prompt injection arxiv nature psyarxiv biorxiv ai use genai content peer review
1

3

0 Votes

1 Posts

271 Views

No one has replied
R

🚫 Bye-Bye Junk Reviews? arXiv might react on LLM spam
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peer Review in Computer Science: good, bad & broken arxiv peer review survey review llm
1

1

0 Votes

1 Posts

266 Views

No one has replied